CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL - LET'S TALK KRONK

Casey Anthony
Accused Murderer of baby Caylee

Caylee Anthony

After listening to the KRONK TESTIMONY one has to question the defense strategy. While the defense attorney has presented a shaky case of defense by accidental death and then panic by Casey. The defense attorney has also thrown all the gobble-gook at the jury by questioning the grandparents, the brother and sexual deviant behavior accusations. 

Roy KRONK

In the meantime; ALL ALONG, before the trial and during the trial defense attorney's had to be familiar with Mr. Kronk and his fairytale story of finding the baby's body. I question not the money motive, but the actual CRIME SCENE, that Kronk declares is where he found the remains of little Caylee. First he alleges that he found the body in August in a swampy wooded area, after he went their to relieve himself. He claims to have called the police. BUT, NO RECORD of HIS CALL at the Emergency Police Phone System was discovered.  He then claims that a uniformed officer came after several calls to emergency number. That officer, was agitated, slipped in the swamp and chastised him for bothering him and the police, since he, (KRONK), could not bring the officer directly to where he claimed to have seen the body.  That officer was disaplined by his Police Department.

Kronk had conversations with his son about the reward money...a number that reaches $250,000 to find the baby alive. He didn't see or hear the word ALIVE!

In December, he calls the police again. The swamp is now mud not water. He claims to have found the baby's body, after taking his inspection stick and sticking it in the eye socket of the skull of the infant. He calls the police, now, 5 months later after his reported initial discovery. He points out the skeleton of the baby to the police, and as they say; "the rest is history". 

However, from my perspective, with more than 35 years of Criminal & Civil Investigations, being the co-author and technical advisor of one of the leading books on Criminal & Civil Investigations, after sitting across the table from known gangsters, killers, con-men, fraudsters and all the other vermin that prey on people. I don't get it!

I listened to his testimony, watched his body language and reviewed the case against Casey Anthony presented to date. I find it unusual that KRONK was not a suspect, or even considered as a potential tamperer of the crime scene, by the placement of the baby. Did he have possession? Was he in anyway familiar with the Casey Anthony or Anthony family? Did he read the meters of the Casey Anthony home?

Instead, defense attorney's are concentrating on the parents, the accident and the brother. Trying in every way to create doubt. One method would have been to point many fingers at KRONK's involvement. (If any?)

His story wandered, changed and was altered. This is not because of a lack of memory, but rather using the fact that "LIARS CANNOT REMEMBER THE LIES! The truth is always remembered.

Did the police miss the point that KRONK's story changes, that the crime scene may have been moved, tampered. Using some forensic evidence, this removes the fact that the body laid for 5 months in the swamp. One Medical Examiner explains, (not on the witness stand) that the foliage and ground under the body should have had more growth, been displaced by the sinking of the swamp and even suggests that the body was placed at the scene much later than August.

WHAT DO YOU THINK???

THIS IS NOT AN ACCUSATION AGAINST KRONK, BUT RATHER QUESTIONS THE IDENTITY OF THE CRIME SCENE AND THE MISGUIDED THEORY OF THE DEFENSE!!!